Social Influence Individual Differences in Independent Behaviour

Social Influence Individual Differences in Independent Behaviour

Video http:// www.youtube.c om/watch?v X eCLVVHm7nY

Independent Behaviour It is possible to resist social influence (this is called independent behaviour). The concept of ‘locus of control’ was developed by Rotter in 1966. It refers to an individual’s perception about how much control they have over their own behaviour. This distinguishes between: Internals (people who attribute the cause of life events to be in their own control – “I made this happen”) Externals (people who attribute control to outside of themselves and so they feel less in control – luck or fate)

Locus of Control This refers to how much control people believe they have over their own lives. It is measured on a dimension, from high internal to high external. Internal A person believes that their behaviour is caused primarily by their own Locus of Control External A person believes that their behaviour is caused primarily by fate, luck or by

Locus of Control Write 1 to 29 down the side of your page. Read through the statements on the A3 sheet. Write down the letter of the statement that you agree with (‘a’ or ‘b’). We will find out if you have in ‘internal’ or ‘external’ personality type.

Locus of Control – Scoring Note there are 6 filler items (1, 8, 14, 19, 24, 27) and 23 scoring items. Score 1 point for each of the following: 2b 3a 4a 5a 6b 7b 9b 10a 11a 12a 13a 15a 16b 17b 18b 20b 21b 22a 23b 25b 26a 28a 29b External low score Internal high score (note that this is reverse-scored from the original Rotter scale).

Practice Questions 1. Explain what is meant by locus of control. (4 marks) 2. Three students, George, Petra and Dan, have just started in the sixth form. Dan is a confident person who thinks that his fate lies firmly in his hands. By the end of the first week, Dan has put himself forward to be nominated as the class representative. Petra has also put her name forward to be nominated. She believes it is just luck whether or not she will be selected and feels that there is not much she can do about it. George did not put his name forward because his father told him not to. (a) (i) What type of locus of control does Petra’s behaviour show? (ii) What type of locus of control does Dan’s behaviour show? (iii) George did not put his name forward as the class representative. Use your knowledge of social influence research to explain this. (4 marks) (b) Which one of the three students is most likely to resist pressures to conform? Use your knowledge of psychology to explain your choice. (4 marks)

Mark Scheme – Question 1 Locus of control is how much a person believes that they have control over events that happen in their lives. This is usually measured along a scale with internal control at one end and external control at the other. Internal control refers to those people who see that they have a great deal of control over their own behaviour and will take responsibility for their own actions. External control refers to those who believe that their behaviour is controlled by other forces such as luck or fate. No reference to internal / external limit to max 2 marks.

Mark Scheme – Question 2 (a) AO2 4 marks (i) Petra is showing external locus of control. (ii) Dan is showing an internal locus of control. (iii) George did not put his name forward as he was obeying his father, someone who he is likely to see as a legitimate authority figure. Candidates could indicate that it was obedience that caused George’s behaviour. They might also refer to the influence of an authority figure. (b) AO2 4 marks The student who is most likely to resist pressure to conform is Dan. He has an internal locus of control and research has suggested that those people who believe that they are in control of their environment are less likely to conform. These personality types are much more likely to behave independently. Dan’s attributional style allows him to resist the pressure to conform. Another reason could be gender. Males have been shown to be more independent than females.