Overview of URC Faculty Fellowship Awards University

Overview of URC Faculty Fellowship Awards University Research Committee Presenters: Kristine Condic, URC Chair and Dorothy Nelson, Vice Provost for Research

University Research Committee – Award Time Table Grant Type Award Amount Application Submission Deadline Award Announced Faculty Fellowship Award up to 10,000 2nd Monday of October 2nd Monday of December Meadow Brook Hall Research Conf. Award 3,000 4th Monday of November 4th Monday of January Student Research Award 300 UG 500 Gr No deadline Six weeks after receipt Faculty Research Excellence Award Nomination 2,500 Faculty New Investigator Research Excellence Award 1,500 4th Monday of January 4th Monday of March Faculty Research Award 1,200 Student Travel Award 400 No deadline Six weeks after receipt Faculty Books, Reports & Page Charge Reimb. 350 max. No deadline Two weeks after request Faculty President’s Colloquium Series Award 1,000 Last day of March Last day of May http://www.oakland.edu/?id 8999&sid 177

A Comment about “Research” The URC faculty research awards are intended to be inclusive of all disciplines – URC membership is diverse, but small – If the applicant’s discipline does not typically involve basic, applied, or social science research techniques that lend themselves to structured proposals, please contact the URC Chair for additional assistance in preparing your application – If the applicant’s discipline is a highly technical field (e.g. STEM), it is important to write the proposal for nonscientist reviewers

Membership Ten faculty, including two faculty members named by the Graduate Council – Vice Provost for Research, ex-officio and non-voting *Kristine Condic, Chair Library Ferman Chavez CAS Carrie Buch SON Karen Sheridan CAS Henry Aigbedo SBA Brian Goslin SEHS Deb McGinnis CAS Lunjin Lu SECS Dorothy Nelson Research Steve Wright and Jim Cipielewski, Grad Council

Faculty Research Fellowships: Who Can Apply? Faculty bargaining unit members at OU – Untenured faculty members may receive Fellowships no more than once every 2 years – Tenured faculty may receive Fellowships no more than once every 3 years. – Active employment contract at the time of the application and during the period of completing the research project. – Cannot also be current URC members There must be a single, lead investigator who will be designated the awardee if the proposal is funded

Faculty Research Fellowships: Obligations/Limitations Recipients are obligated to undertake a 15-week period of full-time research. – This traditionally takes place during the summer term. Awardees cannot also teach during the period of performance of the project Awardees cannot also have other funded commitments (e.g. grant activity) during this period Activities are assumed to occur on campus; applicants must clearly request and justify any off-campus work Final report due within 90 days of completion ( ORA)

How the Funds Can be Spent Any combination of stipend and research expenses – e.g. supplies, minor items of equipment, project assistant wages, technical services, travel expenses – Equipment and travel requests, in particular, must be carefully justified University regulations on travel reimbursement are to be followed; equipment is subject to university property guidelines – Stipend cannot result in exceeding overload compensation limit

Application Process On-line application found at www2.oakland.edu/research/gcsram/login.cfm – Proposals must adhere to the limitations given in the guidelines, otherwise they will not be considered. – Incomplete applications will not be reviewed. All materials (including any supplementary documentation) must be uploaded to RAM as a single file (preferably pdf) and should include the required elements. Due 2nd Monday of October (10/13/14) Tip: Contact Sue Willner for technical assistance or questions about application ([email protected])

Application Process Title page – Include the project title, applicant name(s), affiliation, and a project abstract of 250 words or less. An abstract is a summary of the proposed work, in nontechnical language, that includes brief statements about the significance, the goals, the research plan, and expected outcomes.

Application Process Narrative – Strictly limited to the equivalent of five 8.5″ x 11″ pages with one-inch margins on all sides, single-spaced, in Arial 11 point font or larger. – May include figures and tables, but these count toward the 5-page limit. – The narrative page limits do NOT include the title page, bibliography and supplementary information (budget, CV, current/pending support, etc.). – Proposals that exceed the 5-page limit for the narrative will not be considered for funding.

Project Narrative (i.e. Proposal) This section may not exceed five pages and should, if applicable, include the following sections*: Background/literature review to introduce the research or scholarly topic, Significance/goals/hypotheses Research plan and methods (explain how you will collect data or other relevant information, how and/or where the research or scholarly activities will occur, how you will evaluate your findings or experiences, etc Plans for obtaining relevant regulatory compliance approvals (e.g. IRB, IACUC, IBC, RSC) Proposed outcomes of the funded project, and Timetable (provide milestones for the period of the project, weekly, monthly, or other metric) *If your project does not fit with the above format (e.g. creative arts, humanities), please consult with the URC Chair.

Tips for Narrative Include headings for each required section Tie the goals/hypotheses to methods and expected outcomes – Repeat each one in each section, or use numbering or other reference system – If only one goal/hypothesis, be sure the methods and outcomes relate directly to it Show timetable graphically if possible Tip: Make it as easy as possible for the reviewer!

Bibliography Bibliography (No more than one page) – Select the most relevant literature or other references – Include any literature/other references that you have contributed to – Tip: Demonstrate your knowledge of the subject matter!

Budget and Justification Budget – Template is provided in application – All proposed expenditures (summer salary, student stipend/tuition, supplies, equipment, travel, etc.). Budget Justification – Explain the reason for each line item in the budget – How did you determine or calculate the cost for each? The proposed budget and budget justifications will be reviewed by the entire URC for final approval. – Any changes in the approved budget will require a resubmission of the entire application for review by the URC again. This could result in a delay (e.g., to the summer of the following year).

Biographical Information Curriculum Vitae: Faculty applicants must include a current CV of no more than two pages. – At a minimum, the CV should list the applicant’s education, professional appointments, 5-10 most recent or relevant publications (or performances/ compositions for MTD faculty), and any other information that would indicate that applicant is able and qualified to perform the proposed research.

Current and Pending Grants List all current and pending grants—internal and external. For each grant, provide – Title – Name(s) of principal and co-principal investigator(s) – Funding agency – Duration (inclusive dates) – Dollar amount requested or granted, and portion of budget allocated to faculty salary. Include university-provided start-up funds from the last 2 years. Explain whether there is any duplication of effort or funds relevant to the URC application, and how these will be handled.

Final Report From Most Recent URC Grant Faculty applicants who have received prior fellowship or research grants from the URC should include a copy of the most recent final report that they filed with the Office of Research Administration.

Regulatory Compliance Human or animal subjects, biosafety, radiation safety The PI may submit the compliance approval after the application is submitted to the URC. – If not already obtained, the PI must state the plans for seeking compliance approval in the application. Confirmation of compliance approval is required before funding is received. PI is solely responsible for submitting the compliance approval to the Chair of the URC before starting the project. For assistance, contact the Director of Regulatory Support in the Office of Research Administration. – Rebecca Sandborg PhD ([email protected])

Review Considerations Focus: potential of project to foster future scholarship by applicant Methods, feasibility, probable success Preference may be given to applicants who have not previously had award (if proposals have equal merit) Priority may be given to previous applicants who made efforts to secure external funding (as applicable to the discipline)

Notification By 2nd Monday in December (12/8/14) – Account usually set up in February No written feedback—but URC Chair can provide within 1 month of notification E-mail notification that account has been established – Closed after 1 year, unused funds returned to URC Administration provided by Susan Willner in ORA ([email protected])

Final Report Each award recipient will be expected to file a final report with the Office of Research Administration including: – specific publications, presentations, and other accomplishments that were achieved as a result of the grant. – This report is due within 90 days of the conclusion of the grant-funded activity or the fellowship period.

Common Application Errors Not submitting the proposal narrative and supplementary material in a single file—please contact Susan Willner if you need technical assistance or instructions. Cutting and pasting the narrative from other grant proposals. These are often geared toward a specific audience and are not written for a multi-disciplinary faculty review committee. Providing too little detail on the project proposed. – A solid faculty proposal uses the five allotted pages.

Common Application Errors (cont.) Exceeding page limits for the proposal. – 5 pages - narrative – 1 page - bibliography – 2 page – curriculum vitae summary Listing citations in the bibliography that do not have a direct connection to the proposal narrative Not clearly identifying the methods of the proposed research as specified by your discipline. – While there are no methodological preferences of the committee, a clearly articulated methods section is important in the evaluation of a research project. Not including a detailed timeline and budget and budget justification for the project. Tip: Use the checklist (handout) of the requirements so that you can check your application before submitting

Questions? Contact URC Chair, Professor Kristine Condic For administrative assistance, contact Susan Willner in the Office of Research Administration ([email protected])