FSI Cohort III Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012

FSI Cohort III Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012

THEMES for 2011-2012 School Improvement Process Data Collection, Analysis, Dialogue and Response Shared Leadership--Shared Ownership Shifting Culture to Collaborative Inquiry Implementation and Monitoring School Improvement Initiatives

FSI Materials White Binder MI-CSI Journal Plastic Folders All, Book Talk: got data? NOW WHAT All Flashdrive Macombfsi.net

Michigan Continuous School Improvement Stages and Steps How is school improvement like an iceberg?

Inclusion Activity Traffic Sign Protocol

Today’s Outcomes Receive updates Explore the streamlined SI, ASSIST through AdvancED Check to see where you are with implementing the CCSS School-wide implementation and progress monitoring Explore 6 tools to navigate the SI process Decommissioned-ACT Data Analysis HS only

TAB TWELVE Today’s Agenda Welcome 2011 Themes and Updates What has Changed Due Dates and Professional Learning Common Core State Standards Monitoring the Impact of Strategy Implementation SI Progress Monitoring Data 4 SS/Data Director/MISchooldata Tool Tools and More Tools Network and Planning

TAB One Key Working Agreements A Facilitation Tool Respect all Points of View Be Present and Engaged Honor Time Agreements Get All Voices in the Room These breathe life into our Core Values

TAB One Pages 25-29 Creating Key Working Agreements

TAB One Parking Lot A Facilitation Tool Rest questions that do not benefit the whole group Place questions that do not pertain to content at this time Place questions that pertain, but participants do not want to ask at this time

TAB One LIVING BELIEF STATEMENT “Networking is not an option, but a critical part of how Facilitators of School Improvement learn and share their learning.”

Tab One Page 11 Belief Statements Words—Phrases--Sentence What do you believe about student learning? What do you believe about instruction? What do you believe about how students need to engage in learning?

One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI) Stages and Steps Gather Getting Ready Collect School Data Build School Profile Do Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan Student Achievement Plan Develop Action Plan Study Analyze Data Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice

One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement Stages and Steps Gather Getting Ready Collect School Data Build School Profile I. Diagnostic II. School Process Profile Analyze Data Study Plan Do I. Diagnostic Analysis II. School Process Analysis III. Executive Summary/Goal and Plan Comprehensive Needs Assessment Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice Develop Action Plan Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan School Improvement Plan

Stage One GATHER Step 1: Getting Ready GATHER Getting Ready Collect School Data Build School Profile 4 Considerations School Culture – Collaborative Inquiry Process – Vision, Mission, Core Values and Belief Statements School Decision Making – From Decide and Announce to Consensus Team Building – Stakeholder Analysis – Group vs. Team School Current Reality – ‘Where Are We?’

Getting Ready, Data Collection/Analysis Implement and Monitor SI PLAN GATHER Getting Ready Collect School Data Build School Profile STUDY DO Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan Analyze Data Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice GATHER, STUDY, &DO 09.02.11 – 04.01.12

NEW DYNAMIC and INTUATIVE SYSTEM To INFORM our School Improvement DECISIONS Document I (SDP/A) School Data Profile/Analysis Due Online: 09.01.13 Document II (SPP/A) School Process Profile/Analysis Due Online: 03.08.13 a. MDE: School Process Rubrics 90 b. MDE: School Process Rubrics 40 c. NCA: Assist Self Assessment (Assist SA) d. NCA: Self Assessment (SA) Document III (Summary Report/Goals Management) Summary Report/School Improvement Plan Due Online: 09.01.13

Two Road Maps www.advanc-ed.org/mde www.advanc-ed.org/assist School Process Profile (SPP) document two MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT EDUCATION MDE AdvancED Michigan School Process Rubrics (SPR) 90 Rubrics Self Assessment (SA) 56 Rubrics (Required in the 5th year of your cycle) (Required for the year of the ER) EDYES! 40 Process Rubrics 40 Rubrics (Required Cycles 1-4) Self Assessment Inventory (SAI) 56 Rubrics (Required Cycles 1-4) External Review (ER)

Data and Data Analysis AdvancED Michigan MDE Diagnostic Diagnostic Student Performance Diagnostic Stakeholder Feedback Diagnostic Performance Diagnostic (perception surveys) External Review (ER) 5thYear The Student Diagnostic will be ‘live’ after the ER date has been assigned.

Michigan School Improvement Framework Strand I Teaching for Learning Strand II Strand III Strand IV Strand V Leadership Personnel & Professional Learning School and Community Relations Data and Information Management Standards (12) and Benchmarks (26) 1. Curriculum Aligned, Reviewed & Monitored Communicated 2. Instruction Planning Delivery 3. Assessment Aligned to Curriculum and Instruction Data Reporting and Use 1.Instructional Leadership Educational Program · Instructional Support 1.Personnel Qualifications 2.Shared Leadership School Culture and Climate Continuous Improvement 2.Professional Learning 3.Operational Resource Management Resource Allocation Operational management Requirements Skills, Knowledge, Dispositions Collaboration Content & Pedagogy Alignment 1.Parent/Family Involvement Communication Engagement 2.Community Involvement Communication Engagement 1.Data Management Data Generation, Identification & Collection Data Accessibility Data Support 2.Information Management Analysis & Interpretation Applications

AdvancED Michigan 5 Standards D 3. Teaching and Assessing for Learning. The system’s curriculum, instructional design, and asse uide and ensure teacher effectiveness and student learning across all grades and courses. (Continued on n 3.1 The system’s curriculum provides equitable and challenging learning experiences that ensure all students have sufficient opportunities to develop learning, thinking, and life skills that lead to success at the next level. 3.2 Curriculum, instruction, and assessment throughout the system are monitored and adjusted systematically in response to data from multiple assessments of student learning and an examination of professional practice. 3.3 Teachers throughout the district engage students in their learning through instructional strategies that ensure achievement of learning expectations. 3.4 System and school leaders monitor and support the improvement of instructional practices of teachers to ensure student success. 3.5 The system operates as a collaborative learning organization through structures that support improved instruction and student learning at all levels.

Executive Summary Components Vision Mission Belief Statements Strengths/Weaknesses Complete every Year Due 09.01.2013

One e6 GATHER Getting Ready Collect School Data Build Profile ir te w k c i u Q 23

One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI) Stages and Steps Gather Getting Ready Collect School Data Build School Profile Do Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan Student Achievement Plan Develop Action Plan Study Analyze Data Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice

Stage One GATHER Step 1: Getting Ready GATHER Getting Ready Collect School Data Build School Profile

Stage One GATHER Step 1 Getting Ready GATHER Getting Ready Collect School Data Build School Profile 4 Considerations School Culture – Collaborative Inquiry Process – Vision, Mission, Core Values and Belief Statements School Decision Making – From Consensus to Decide and Announce Team Building – Stakeholder Analysis – Group vs. Team School Current Reality – ‘Where Are We?’

Change Video You Cannot Send a Duck to Eagle School And Other Simple Truths of Leadership By Mac Anderson “Wisdom is knowing the right path to take INTEGRITY is taking it!!”

Reading Minute The Gorilla Story Source: A Trainer’s Companion: Stories to Stimulate Reflection Conversation, and Action by Walter Olsen ad William Sommers (2004)

Tab One Page 54 Understanding Change Activities Trust Vision Skills Resources Payoff Action Plan Shared Values/Beliefs Trust Vision Skills Resources Payoff Action Plan Shared Values/Beliefs Trust Vision Skills Resources Payoff Action Plan Shared Values/Beliefs Trust Vision Skills Resources Payoff Action Plan Shared Values/Beliefs Trust Vision Skills Resources Payoff Action Plan Shared Values/Beliefs Trust Vision Skills Resources Payoff Action Plan Shared Values/Beliefs Trust Vision Skills Resources Payoff Action Plan Shared Values/Beliefs Trust Vision Skills Resources Payoff Action Plan Shared Values/Beliefs Change

Who Needs to be on Board? Consideration 3: Stakeholders Early Adopter F.O.B. Free on Board Dependent By-Stander Victim Cynic Scarlett O’Hara Rhett Butler GATHER Getting Ready Collect School Data Build School Profile Tab One Page 55 Choose your category. Think about the people you work with and decide what % of the staff resides in each category.

One Potential Response toward selecting and implementing successful Professional Development Concern-Based Adoption Model CBAM Developed by Gene Hall and Shirley Hord 2001 This helps principals and leadership teams consider staffs’ feelings and concerns when designing professional learning experiences at schools.

CBAM Outline 7 Stages of Concern These are the responses learners experience to change Stage 6: REFOCUSING “Perhaps if we thought about integrating this with our SS program, we could accomplish more.” Stage 5: COLLABORATION “How can I learn about what others are Stage 4: CONSEQUENCE “How will this affect my classroom?” Stage 3: MANAGEMENT ‘Where would I find the time to do this?” Stage 2: PERSONAL Stage 1: INFORMATIONAL Stage 0: AWARENESS “I heard about that” Doing?” “Wait, how can I possibly do a new thing.” “I’d like to know more about what that is.”

www.advanc-ed.org/mde moves to www.advanc-ed.org/assist Adaptive System School Improvement Support Tool ASSIST

Accessing ASSIST – Option 1 www.advanc-ed.org/assist 34 2012 AdvancED

NEW ASSIST TABS

Accessing ASSIST – Option 2 Log into the Management System and use one of the ASSIST links 36 2012 AdvancED

ASSIST Overview Appropriate task will be assigned to priority and focus school 37 2012 AdvancED

ASSIST Overview Click here to view the task details 38 2012 AdvancED

These diagnostics are marked optional because only one is required, not both 39 2012 AdvancED

42 2012 AdvancED

43 2012 AdvancED

LABLING is EVERYTHING

45 2012 AdvancED

Noteworthy Elementary Professional Learning Opportunities MI School Data New Data Availability Handout www.mischooldata.org 12-13 Parent Involvement and Title I – 02.11.12 MISD MI Professional Learning Standards

Macomb County PLC Self Help Group Facilitator: Dr. Rick Repicky These meetings take place on the FOUR Tuesdays of the month at 10:00 am at the MISD. They are open to District and School Administrators and teachers. DATES 10.02.12 11.13.12 01.15.13 03.26.13 ROOM # 103 A/B 206 202 202

Important Dates Register at: www.gomiem.org AdvancED MI Fall Conference 11.08.12 Lansing Center, Lansing MDE Fall Conference 11.08.12 4:00-7:00 pm 11.09.12 8:30 -4:00 pm Lansing Lansing Center, Lansing Lansing Center,

REMINDER to REGISTER School Improvement Teams Work Day 04.19.13 Title I only 04.26.13 Title I only 04.30.13 Title I only 05.07.13 Non Title I 05.08.13 Non Title I 05.14.13 Non Title I 05.15.13 Non Title I

Alternative Dates Make-up Days: must register 02.01.13 04.24.13 SB-CEUs: 2.7 completed in MAY

Item Types I. Selected Response (SR): Used primarily for Claim 1 and administered via computer adaptive testing (CAT) Multiple Choice II. (a) Technology Enhanced Constructed Response Tasks (TE/CR): Used primarily for Claims 2-4 and administered via CAT Complex tasks that are structured as a sequence of short constructed response items Tasks require longer chains of reasoning II. (b) Extended Response Constructed Response Tasks (ER/CR): Used primarily for Claims 2-4 and administered in the classroom (not necessarily exclusive of all technology) Tasks require longer chains of reasoning and call for extended written answers Scoring rubric provided III. Performance Tasks (PT): Used primarily for Claim 4 and administered in the classroom (not necessarily exclusive of all technology) May require more than one instructional period May incorporate pre-work in small groups Scoring rubric provided

Mathematics

Smarter Balanced Movie and Popcorn Task: View the 14 minute video Think about the following question and use your sticky notes to record important ideas. What evidence can you site that students and teachers are working at an increased Depth of Knowledge (DOK)?

Smarter Balanced Movie and Popcorn Continued Task: Have a conversation with your partner on notes taken. Discuss the evidence you have that students and teachers were working at an increased Depth of Knowledge. What structures do you see that are in place for these DOK to be accomplished? Be ready to “pop” up and share.

Smarter Balanced Consortium Have you SHIFTED to the Common Core? Career and College Readiness Standards Transition Guidance 2012

Common Core (Communicator) Implementation Checklist for Principals Leadership, Awareness Building, and Communication Professional Learning Implications for Student Learning Capacity Building Special Considerations for Your School

Smarter Balanced Videos Elementary School Video Middle School Video High School Video

Stage One: GATHER Step 1: Getting Ready GATHER Getting Ready Collect School Data Build School Profile

“In God we trust, everyone else brings DATA”

One Common Voice – One Plan Stage One Gather: Step 2 Collect School Data ns o iti n What do you already know? fi De What data do you need to know? What additional information/data do you need to know? Where can the information/data be found? Demographic Achievement or Student Contextual Outcome Data Data Describes our students, staff, building, and community Process Data The policies, How our students procedures, and perform on local, systems we have state and federal in place that assessments define how we do (subgroups) business Perception Data Opinions of staff, parents, community and students regarding our school

Tab Two Page 3-4 What types of data are/are not readily available in your building? Demographic Data Enrollment Subgroups of students Staff Attendance (Students and Staff) Mobility Graduation and Dropout Conference Attendance Education status Student subgroups Parent Involvement Teaching Staff Course enrollment patterns Discipline referrals Suspension rates Alcohol‐tobacco‐drugs violations Participation extra‐ curriculars Physical, mental, social and health Achievement/ Outcome Data Local assessments: District Common Assessments, Classroom Assessments, Report Cards State assessments: MME, ACT, MEAP, MI-Access, MEAP Access, ELPA National assessments: ACT Plan, ACT Explore, ACT WorkKeys, NWEA, ITBS, CAT, MET NAEP, PSAT GPA Dropout rates College acceptance 65 Process Data Perception Data Policies and procedures (e.g. grading, homework, attendance, discipline) Academic and behavior expectations Parent participation – PT conferences, PTO/PTA, volunteers Suspension data School Process Profile Rubrics (40 or 90) or SA/SAR (NCA) Event occurred: Who, what, when, where, why, how What you did for Whom: Eg. All 8th graders received violence Prevention Survey data (student, parent, staff, community) Opinions Clarified what others think People act based on what they believe How do they see you/us?

Stage One Gather Step 2 Collect School Data GATHER Getting Ready Collect School Data Build School Profile DEMOGRAPHICS PERFORMANCE PROCESS PERCEPTION DEMOGRAPHICS PERFORMANCE PROCESS PERCEPTION

One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement Stages and Steps Gather Getting Ready Collect School Data Build School Profile Do Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan Student Achievement Plan Develop Action Plan Study Analyze Data Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice

Stage Four: DO Step 9: Implement Plan DO Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan

Identifying Activities MATRIX 1 Connection to SPR 40/90, SA/Assist SA* How will you address the targeted areas in your Summary Report (SPP)? Getting Ready to Implement How will you ensure readiness for implementation? How will you ensure that participants have the knowledge and skills to implement? POSSIBILE ACTIVITIES Professional development around strategy Purchase materials Planning for implementation – Identify schedule for strategy use, personnel, mechanism for monitoring, rollout, etc. Communication vehicles Implement Monitoring Fidelity of Implementation and Impact How will you ensure successful implementation for your selected activities? How will you ensure the program/activity is implemented with fidelity? How will you monitor the programs impact on student achievement? POSSIBLE ACTIVITIES Communication – to whom? How? Instructional technology* Activities to support at-risk students (For Title One students)* Parent Involvement POSSIBLE ACTIVITIES Walkthroughs PLC/CASL meetings Documentation of impact Demonstration classrooms Gathering achievement data *Required Components

Stage Four: DO Step 10: Monitor Plan DO Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan

So we’ve written a stellar school improvement plan Do Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan Overarching Questions How do we know we’re implementing it? How do we know the strategy is impacting student achievement?

EVALUATE THE IMPACT ON STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT Do Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan (Summative) DID IT WORK? Implementation: Adult Focused Impact: Student Focused MONITOR EVALUATE MONITOR ARE STRATEGIES AND ACTIVITIES BEING IMPLEMENTED WITH FIDELITY? DID WE IMPLEMENTTHE PLAN/STRATEGIES CORRECTLY & CONSISTENTLY? IS WHAT WE ARE DOING WORKING? ARE WE COLLECTING & USING STUDENT AND ADULT DATA TO MODIFY & ADJUST ONGOING IMPLEMENTATIO? DID WE GIVE IT ENOUGH TIME? ENOUGH RESOURCES? ARE WE SHOWING EVIDENCE OF STUDENT GROWTH? WHAT INTERIM ADJUSTMENTS ARE SUGGESTED BY IMPLEMENTATION DATA? HOW MIGHT THESE ADJUSTMENTS AFFECT THE INTEGRITY OF THE RESULTS? MONITOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLAN (Formative) IS IT WORKING? EVALUATE DID OUR STRATEGIES RESULT IN INCREASED STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT? WHAT UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES (GOOD AND BAD) HAVE OCCURRED?

EVALUATE THE IMPACT ON STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT (Summative) DID IT WORK? Implementation: Adult Focused MONITOR ARE STRATEGIES AND ACTIVITIES BEING IMPLEMENTED WITH FIDELITY? ARE WE COLLECTING & USING STUDENT AND ADULT DATA TO MODIFY & ADJUST ONGOING IMPLEMENTATIO? Do Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan Impact: Student Focused EVALUATE MONITOR IS WHAT WE ARE DOING WORKING? ARE WE SHOWING EVIDENCE OF STUDENT GROWTH? WHAT INTERIM ADJUSTMENTS ARE SUGGESTED BY IMPLEMENTATION DATA? HOW MIGHT THESE ADJUSTMENTS AFFECT THE INTEGRITY OF THE RESULTS? MONITOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLAN (Formative) IS IT WORKING? EVALUATE

Just Do IT! Monitor Implementation Evaluate Implementation Monitor Impact Evaluate Impact Do Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan Adult Focused Student Focused

Grade Level or Content Area Strategy Implementation MATRIX 2

Proficiency to Z score If you define "growth" as performance level change and/or a positive fouryear-slope, then growth would be in the improvement part of the school performance index.

Progress Monitoring Anchor Bay Middle School North Kris Deagan Sarah Kessel-Glassford [email protected]

Tools Tools Tools School Self Assessment of SI Planning Processes Protocols for Dialoging Text Developing Individual Learning Goals Culture of Trust/Collegial Visit Family and Community Partnership Systems and Collaboration Inventory

Directions Each participant reads about one tool Identify ways to use the TOOL to support SI initiatives ‘Use the SI Tools Use’ form to record Report out to hole group Meet in school teams to create a plan for use

Stage One: Gather Step 2: Collecting School Data Step 3: Build School Profile GATHER Getting Ready Collect School Data Build School Profile Data Director D4SS MISchooldata.org Presenter Dr. Jennifer Parker-Moore Personnel Skilled in Technology Assessment This is an annual survey. Assessment window will open 10.21.12 Technology Assessment due: December 2012