Debt and Taxes Chapter 15

Debt and Taxes Chapter 15

In Perfect Markets Capital Structure is irrelevant Risks of debt and equity (beta’s) are affected by leverage – EPS risk changes with capital structure WACC (used to calculate firm value) not affected Recapitalization is zero-NPV – Seasoned Equity Offerings (SEO’s) do not dilute shareholder value – Share repurchase does not increase share price.

Today The tax advantage of debt Computing the interest tax shield – Permanent debt – Fixed debt to equity ratio The WACC Value of recapitalization Personal taxes – Other limits to the tax advantage of debt Use of debt around the world

Actual Leverage Levels In reality, however, firms manage their capital structure very carefully Different firms, e.g., in different industries or different stages of growth, have different capital structures Firm Debt Equity D/E CAT 28.4B 63.9B 0.44 AAPL 0 324.3B 0 HP 20.4B 90.7B 0.22 DELL 6B 29.49B 0.20 PEP 24.9B 102.2B 0.24 MIC 28.6B 198.1B 0.14 JPM 1,941.5B 178.8B 10.8

Government as Claim Holder Firm X Value of all future cash flows from project Government Shareholders Debt holders

Debt Tax Advantage Corporations pay tax on the income they earn after interest payments are deducted Interest expenses reduce the amount of corporate tax firms must pay This introduces a benefit for using debt Consider the example of Safeway, Inc. a grocery store chain.

Interest and tax deduction Example (page 460) Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) were 1.25 billion in 2005, interest expenses were 400 million, and its marginal corporate tax rate was 35%. Lets calculate the effect of leverage on Safeway’s net income by considering two scenarios: without leverage and with leverage as it is now.

Calculating tax payments Example continued

Value implications Example continued Leverage reduces the corporation’s tax liability and its net income But it creates value for equity holders! Look at the total value of the firm – that is, the payoffs to claims issued by the firm With leverage total payoff is 552 400 952 while without leverage its 812. The government is paid the 140 difference. Leverage increased firm value by 140 million.

The Interest Tax Shield Example continued The loan of 400 million reduced tax payments by 400 (0.35) 140 This is referred to as the interest tax shield The interest tax shield is the additional amount the firm would have paid in taxes if it did not have leverage

Cash flows and leverage

Computing the interest tax shield Example page 461

Computing the interest tax shield Example continued

Computing the interest tax shield Example continued

Valuing the interest tax shield The interest tax shield is positive when EBIT exceeds the interest payment The value of the interest tax shield is the present value of all future interest tax shields The value of a levered firm exceeds the value of an all else equal unlevered firm by the value of the interest tax shield APV method VL VU PV(Interest tax shield)

Valuing the interest tax shield Example page 463 DFB takes a ten year loan of 2 billion at the risk free interest rate of 5%. DFB will pay interest of 100 million at the end of each year for the ten years and will repay the principal at maturity DFB’s marginal tax rate is 35% Lets calculate the PV(interest tax shield)

Valuing the interest tax shield

.now suppose the firm will roleover the debt for another 10 years upon maturity

Calculating PV of Interest Tax Shield To calculate the PV of the interest tax shield we need some assumptions In practice: – Debt changes overtime – Interest rates change overtime – Default risk changes overtime – Tax rates vary with profitability We will first consider a simple case of Permanent Debt – Fixed Debt/interest rate/tax rate

The interest tax shield: permanent debt Debt outstanding: D (assume risk free debt) Marginal tax rate: τC Risk free rate: rf Calculate: Annual interest payment Annual tax shield PV(interest tax sheild)

The Assumptions made: Assumptions: – Debt payments are risk free – The firm can cover its debt payments at all times with zero probability for default These assumptions fit very few transactions Actually, we don’t need such strong assumptions. From the no-arbitrage principle: PV(Interest payments) ?

The interest tax shield: permanent debt PV(Interest tax shield) τC x D

Levering up to capture the tax shield Leveraged recaps were very popular in mid to late 1980’s By doing so firms reduced their tax liability (among other things ) Example page 468 Midco has 20m shares @ 15 and no debt Its tax rate is 35% It plans to borrow 100m to repurchase shares Lets trace this transaction and its implications for the stock price of Midco (what do you expect?)

Leveraging up to capture the tax shield

Leveraging up to capture the tax shield

Leveraging up to capture the tax shield

Personal taxes and the interest tax shield Debt allows corporations to pay more of its cash flows to debt holders For individuals – Interest payments are taxed as income – Dividends and capital gains are taxed separately What are the consequences of investors’ taxes on firm value?

Personal taxes and the interest tax shield

Personal taxes and the interest tax shield

Personal taxes and the interest tax shield

Personal taxes and the interest tax shield The effective tax advantage of debt τ* 1 – (1-τc)(1-τe)/(1-τi) The interest tax shield with personal taxes VL VU τ* D

Optimal Capital Structure with taxes When raising new capital from investors firms primarily do so by issuing debt

Optimal Capital Structure with taxes For the average firm debt accounts for 30%45% of firm value depending on the year

Optimal capital structure with taxes There are large differences across industries (2005)

Limits to the tax benefit of debt There is a tax advantage to debt only if the firm is paying taxes in the first place No corporate tax benefit arises from interest payments in excess of EBIT There is a cost associated with such excess leverage

Limits to the tax benefit of debt It is optimal (from a tax perspective) to set interest payments equal to EBIT Can a firm predict its EBIT? What does risk associated with EBIT do to the value of the tax shield?

Limits to the tax benefit of debt Consider high growth firms Firms in early stages of development have little earnings if at all Optimal debt is proportional to current earnings Value of equity is determined by future earnings From a tax perspective, high growth firms optimally aim for lower debt to value ratios

Limits to the tax benefit of debt Alternative tax shields Several firms pay their employees stock options – that is the option to purchase the stock at the strike price some time in the future (as a substitute to salary) IRS allows the firm to deduct the discount relative to the current price but it didn’t affect EBIT under GAAP Result – Microsoft, Cisco, Dell, Qualcomm had no taxable income (reported in 2000) Stock option deductions for entire Nasdaq 100 exceeded aggregate pretax earnings

Comparing interest payments to EBIT

The low leverage puzzle Firms shield about one third of their earnings before interest and tax True internationally

Assigned questions Chapter 15 1, 4, 6, 13, 18 Data case 1-6