Costin, G. (2023, March 30). Chronotype and sleep quality during

Costin, G. (2023, March 30). Chronotype and sleep quality during remote and in-person activities in an academic context [Invited speaker]. McGill University Honours Research Seminar, Montreal, QC, Canada. Chronotype and Sleep Quality during Remote and In-Person Activities in an Academic Context PSYC380D Honours Research Seminar 2001 avenue McGill College March 30, 2023

Presented by Georgiana Costin Research Assistant and Honours Psychology Student at the Adaptech Research Network Supervised by Dr. Catherine Fichten

Theoretical Background : COVID-19 and Sleep Sleep can be affected by different stressors Negative factors: Positive factors: Lack of commute Flexibility/comfort from studying/working from home Uncertainty, worry Grief Isolation Pre-existing health or mental health conditions Reduced physical activity Hyun et al., 2021; Saguem et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2022

Theoretical background : Chronotype Chronotype: our body’s natural disposition to want to sleep or be awake at certain times 3 chronotypes: Morningness (“early birds”) Intermediate or neither Eveningness (“night owls”)

Theoretical background : Chronotype Morningness associated with: Lower risk of poor sleep Better grades More social support More mindfulness Eveningness associated with: Poorer sleep quality Worse psychological well-being Greater daytime dysfunction Higher stress responses More frequent substance use Intermediate chronotype associated with: Lower risk of poor sleep Zhou et al., 2020 ; Glavin et al., 2021 ; Roeser et al., 2012 ; Bakotic et al., 2016 ; Enright et al., 2017 ; Sun et al., 2019 ; Walsh et al., 2021

General Aim What role has chronotype played in affecting sleep quality during the remote and in-person periods of the pandemic? Specifically: faculty, non-teaching staff and students

Why is this research important? Lack of research on chronotype and COVID-19 Contribute to knowledge in the field of sleep Make recommendations to institutions regarding work and course schedules

Method Recruited 65 individuals from Dawson College in 2022-2033 22 teachers (86% female; 40% were 55 and over) 21 non-teaching staff (76% female ; 67% were 45 and over) 22 students (59.1% female, 31.8% male, 9.1% other ; 82% were between 18-24) Email-based study Participants completed: Two 10-point questions about their sleep quality (Bailes et al., 2023) Demographic questions Reduced Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (Chelminski et al., 2000)

Sleep Quality Questions 1. On a scale of 1 to 10, with 1 being very poor and 10 being very good, overall, what was the quality of your sleep during your last remote / online learning/working/teaching semester? 2. On a scale of 1 to 10, with 1 being very poor and 10 being very good, overall, what was the quality of your sleep during your most recent in-person learning/working/teaching semester?

Chelminski et al., 2000

Aim 1 Hypotheses: How did the COVID-19 pandemic affect the sleep quality of students and staff during remote and in-person activities? Students will have better sleep quality remotely than staff Students will have better sleep quality during the remote than during the inperson period

Aim 1 Results: No difference between the groups (p 0.05), but generally individuals slept better remotely (p 0.04) Sleep Quality of Staff and Students During Remote and In-Person Periods 8 7.5 Staff Students Sleep Quality 7 6.5 6 5.5 5 4.5 4 Remote Period In-Person Period Period of Time

Aim 2 Hypotheses: Did chronotype impact the sleep quality of post-secondary students, faculty and nonteaching staff during the remote and in-person activities of COVID-19? Eveningness chronotype: Sleep quality remote semester Sleep quality inperson semester During the in-person semester: Morningness chronotype Eveningness chronotype.

Aim 2 Results: Individuals with morningness and intermediate chronotypes slept significantly better than the eveningness chronotype (p .001) Sleep Quality Based on Chronotype During Remote and In-Person Periods 8 7.5 Eveningness Intermediat e Morningnes s Sleep Quality 7 6.5 6 5.5 5 4.5 4 Remote Period In-Person Period Period of Time

Conclusion Main aim: What role has chronotype played in affecting sleep quality during the remote and in-person periods of the pandemic? Aim 1: Sleep quality of staff and students during COVID-19 remote/in-person o No difference in sleep quality between staff and students o Individuals slept better during remote activities Aim 2: Did chronotype have an impact on sleep quality? o Morningness and intermediate chronotypes slept significantly better than eveningnnes chronotypes

Small sample size Limitations Difficult for participants to recall their sleep quality retrospectively Difficulty recruiting students who were also at Dawson during COVID19 Disability was self-reported

Thank you!

References Bailes, S., Rizzo, D., Fichten, C., Baltzan, M., Grad, R., Creti, L., Amsel, R., & Libman, E. (2023). Should testing for obstructive sleep apnea be offered routinely to older family medicine patients? A prospective cohort study. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2023.2176525 Bakotic, M., Radosevic-Vidacek, B., & Koscec Bjelajac, A. (2017). Morningness–eveningness and daytime functioning in university students: The mediating role of sleep characteristics. Journal of Sleep Research, 26(2), 210–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.12467 Chelminski, I., Petros, T. V., Plaud, J. J., & Ferraro, F. R. (2000). Psychometric properties of the reduced Horne and Ostberg questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 29(3), 469–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00208-1 Enright, T., & Refinetti, R. (2017). Chronotype, class times, and academic achievement of university students. Chronobiology International, 34(4), 445–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/07420528.2017.1281287 Glavin, E. E., Ceneus, M., Chanowitz, M., Kantilierakis, J., Mendelow, E., Mosquera, J., & Spaeth, A. M. (2021). Relationships between sleep, exercise timing, and chronotype in young adults. Journal of Health Psychology, 26(13), 2636–2647. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105320926530 Hyun, S., Hahm, H. C., Wong, G. T. F., Zhang, E., & Liu, C. H. (2021). Psychological correlates of poor sleep quality among U.S. young adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sleep Medicine, 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2020.12.009

References Roeser, K., Meule, A., Schwerdtle, B., Kubler, A., & Schlarb, A. A. (2012). Subjective sleep quality exclusively mediates the relationship between morningness-eveningness preference and self-perceived stress response. Chronobiology International, 29(7), 955–960. https://doi.org/10.3109/07420528.2012.699124 Saguem, B. N., Nakhli, J., Romdhane, I., & Nasr, S. B. (2022). Predictors of sleep quality in medical students during COVID-19 confinement. L’Encephale: Revue de Psychiatrie Clinique Biologique et Therapeutique, 48(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.encep.2021.03.001 Sun, J., Chen, M., Cai, W., Wang, Z., Wu, S., Sun, X., & Liu, H. (2019). Chronotype: Implications for sleep quality in medical students. Chronobiology International, 36(8), 1115–1123. https://doi.org/10.1080/07420528.2019.1619181 Walsh, N. A., Repa, L. M., & Garland, S. N. (2022). Mindful larks and lonely owls: The relationship between chronotype, mental health, sleep quality, and social support in young adults. Journal of Sleep Research, 31(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.13442 Wang, W., Guo, Y., Du, X., Li, W., Wu, R., Guo, L., & Lu, C. (2022). Associations between poor sleep quality, anxiety symptoms, and depressive symptoms among Chinese adolescents before and during COVID-19: A longitudinal study. Frontiers in Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.786640 Zhou, J., Hsiao, F.-C., Shi, X., Yang, J., Huang, Y., Jiang, Y., Zhang, B., & Ma, N. (2021). Chronotype and depressive symptoms: A moderated mediation model of sleep quality and resilience in the 1st-year college students. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 77(1), 340–355. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23037